Key Indicator- 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership
6.1.1	QlM	The governance of the institution is reflective of and in tune with the vision and mission of the institution
6.1.2	QlM	Effective leadership is visible in various institutional practices such as decentralization and participative management.
		Key Indicator- 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment
6.2.1	QlM	The institutional Strategic/ perspective plan is effectively deployed
6.2.2	QlM	The functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment and service rules, procedures, etc.
6.2.3	QnM	Implementation of e-governance in areas of operation
		Key Indicator- 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies
6.3.1	QlM	The institution has effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff
6.3.2	QnM	The average percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years
6.3.3	QnM	Average number of professional development /administrative training programs organized by the institution for teaching and non teaching staff during the last five years
6.3.4	QnM	The average percentage of teachers undergoing online/face-to-face Faculty Development Programmes (FDP) during the last five years. (Professional Development Programmes, Orientation / Induction Programmes, Refresher Course, Short Term Course etc.)
6.3.5	QlM	Institutions Performance Appraisal System for teaching and non-teaching staff
		Key Indicator- 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization
6.4.1	QlM	The institution conducts internal and external financial audits regularly
6.4.2	QnM	Funds / Grants received from non-government bodies, individuals, philanthropists during the last five years (not covered in Criterion III)
6.4.3	QlM	Institutional strategies for mobilization of funds and the optimal utilization of resources
		Key Indicator- 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System
6.5.1	QlM	Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly to institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes
6.5.2	QlM	The institution reviews its teaching-learning process, structures & methodologies of operations, and learning outcomes at periodic intervals through IQAC set up as per norms and recorded the incremental improvement in various activities. (For the first cycle – Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years with regard to quality)
6.5.3	QnM	Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include 1. Regular meeting of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC); Feedback collected, analyzed, and used for improvements 2. Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s) 3. Participation in NIRF 4. any other quality audit recognized by the state, national or international agencies (ISO Certification, NBA)